Lab+Report

Type in the content of your new page here. ·  Entries are dated and titled ·  Focus question relates to the big idea, it is student generated in own words ·  Hypothesis is written in sentence form and reflects thinking ·  Experimental data is clearly organized, and accurate (tables, graphs, diagrams) ·  Claims are well supported by evidence. Claims reflect the rules and/or underlying principles. Evidence includes what works and what doesn’t work when appropriate ·  Conclusion uses an appropriate topic sentence that clearly reflects the focus question. Shows detailed analysis and interpretation of data, uses key terms appropriately. ·  Entries are neat and legible (easy for the reader to follow). Includes two questions for further study || ·  Entries are dated and titled ·  Focus question relates to the big idea, it is student generated in own words ·  Hypothesis is written in sentence form and reflects thinking ·  Experimental data is adequately organized, and accurate (tables, graphs, diagrams). May include a few minor errors ·  Claims are adequately supported by evidence. Claims reflect the rules and/or underlying principles. Evidence includes what works and what doesn’t work when appropriate ·  Conclusion uses an adequate topic sentence that reflects the focus question. Shows adequate analysis and interpretation of data, uses key terms appropriately ·  Entries are mostly neat and legible (easy for the reader to follow). Includes one question for further study ||  ·   Entries may be missing dates or titles  ·   Focus question somewhat relates to the big idea, it is student generated  ·   Hypothesis is written in sentence form and reflects some thinking  ·   Some experimental data is missing or is not organized properly (tables, graphs, diagrams)  ·   Claims are not always supported by evidence. Claims do not reflect the rules and/or underlying principles. Evidence somewhat includes what works and what doesn’t work when appropriate  ·   Conclusion uses an adequate topic sentence, that somewhat reflects the focus question. Shows some analysis and interpretation of data, uses key terms somewhat appropriately. ·   Entries are somewhat difficult to read (messy). Includes one question for further study ||  ·   Entries may not include dates or titles  ·   Focus question not related to the big idea  ·   Hypothesis is written in sentence form and reflects no thinking  ·   Experimental data is incomplete and not organized (tables, graphs, diagrams missing)  ·   Claims are not supported by evidence. Claims do not reflect the rules and/or underlying principles. Evidence does not include what works and what doesn’t work when appropriate  ·   Conclusion uses an inadequate topic sentence that does not relate to the focus question. Little analysis and interpretation of data, uses key terms inappropriately.  ·   Entries are difficult to read (messy, illegible). No question for further study ||  ·   No response or response does not meet what is asked for  ·   Is incoherent or undeveloped  ·   Contains serious and persistent errors ||
 * SCORE ||   CRITERIA   ||
 * 4 || = Achieving the Standard with Honors =
 * 3 || = Achieving the Standard =
 * 2 || = Nearly Achieving the Standard =
 * 1 || == Some Evidence of Achieving the Standard  ==
 * 0 || == Little or No Evidence of Achieving the Standard  ==